 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
Are you alone in your knowing? Join with Like Minded Others at Planetxtownhall.com |
|
|
Holy Sites Are First TargetsYOWUSA.COM, 11-September-00
The full interview was aired Sunday morning on CNN's World News program, during which Arafat realized that he had slipped up and then abruptly ended the interview by pulling off his clip-on microphone. He then brusquely departed the interview cubicle surrounded by Palestinian staffers with very concerned looks on their faces. Something was said that should have not been said. The Obvious SlipDuring most of his interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour he skillfully deflected her questions with the usual pat answers. To Amanpour's credit, she did not conduct the usual Larry King style interview, but chose to drive home her questions, with unrelenting intensity. When she questioned him on the issue of shared sovereignty over Jerusalem, Arafat again deflected the question with a bulleted statement:
As I have mentioned, this problem in Jerusalem it is for the Arabs, Christians and Muslims." It is interesting to note Arafat's statesman like control of his own body language. He knows that he has this answered covered, and proceeds with a prepared answer, expecting that Amanpour would simply move on to something less intrusive. However, she did not. Undaunted, Amanpour returned to the same issue of shared sovereignty from a completely different angle by asking Arafat if he would prolong the peace process. Amanpour asked, "Would it be safer and better for you to extend this state of affairs that certain people would say is a sellout?" Arafat responded: "First of all, I respect I had mentioned and promised my people, my nation, my religions, the Christianity and Islam and I'm not going to betray them. I will continue to liberate all Islamic and Muslim holy places. If not (pointing to himself) another one will come along to liberate it."
At this point, Arafat leaned towards her and asked her if she knew what the holy places were, and after expressing several choppy thoughts suddenly leaned back in his chair and immediately changed his body language. The change was unmistakable. He obviously realized that he had said something that he would not have said, were he in control of the interview. He feigned a quick smile and announced that the interview was over. He then began pulling the clip-on microphone from his lapel and a very concerned Palestinian aide walked onto the set to help him undo the wireless microphone device. Without so much as a goodbye, he left leaving his back to a shocked Amampur who could only mumble her thanks for the interview. An Unfortunate Choice of Language?
You're Not Alone! Join with Like-minded Others on the Planet X Town Hall
The following sequence of events in this interview demonstrate a revealing moment:
The Difference a Word MakesAfter a year of Clinton's Monicagate, America is still wondering what "is" really means so why get picky with just one word -- targets? In a word, context. Arafat is an accomplished public speaker with a superb command of the English language. As a politician, he knows that the word "targets" carries military overtones. The fact that he moved so quickly and rudely to end the interview indicates that he realized that he had mistakenly used the the word "targets" in what some would call a classic Freudian Slip that revealed his inner thoughts based on conversations he has shared with others. If you feel that this analysis is too focused on the word "targets" then ask yourself this question, "what single act of terror would inflame the Arab world more than the sudden and violent destruction of a treasured Muslim holy site. Would Arafat himself want such a thing to happen? Doubtedly not. But what he may know is there is someone with less reverence for Muslim holy sites and that this person harbors the desire to inflame a regional conflict. For such a person, bombing a Muslim holy site would be an inexpensive and expedient way to start a new war in the Middle East which could serve to foment another world war. View The CNN Video ClipCNN, September 7, 2000
|
||||
YowRadio.com
|
 |
In July 2008, a two-stage crop circle larger than three soccer fields materialized in England on a farm near Avebury, Wiltshire. Unlike more common symmetrical snowflake formations, this one evidenced a clear and unmistakable message: That in December 2012 we will see the appearance of a celestial harbinger. One that portends a global tribulation in which life as we know it will come to an end.
Fully coherent and free of exceptions, the Avebuy 2008 formation is an urgent warning from distant friends to those who get it and who want to get through it. That is why the first part of this book, "The Bad News," presents a series of more than 50 illustrations to decode this message with easy-to-follow, building-block explanations. Intended for the common man, the goal is to empower the reader and this need is great.
This is because those who survive the tribulation will live to bear witness to the single greatest die-back event in the history of our species. A pole shift as predicated by America's "sleeping prophet," Edgar Cayce (1877-1945) and it could happen as soon as 2013. When it does, it will be a time of testing that favors the meek over the wealthy and powerful. But not for reasons you might think.
If you get it and want to get through it, this is the book you've been waiting for. GO
New to the topic? This 5-part video series, will get you quickly immersed in the key concepts. From there, you'll be able to connect the dots for yourself very quickly.
Please feel free to share complete and unedited copies of these programs with others. All other rights reserved.
|
Cut to the Chase Internet Radio |
| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
|
| ©2012 Your World, Inc. — All Rights Reserved | ||
| The Sagan Continuation Project: We WELCOME all who RESPECT our FREE WILL. If you CHOOSE to HELP, then help us to help ourselves. There is GOOD HERE too. WE LOOK for a reply, | ||
|
|
||
In a heated interview with CNN's Christiane
Amanpour last Thursday, Yasser Arafat may have very well revealed where the next conflict will begin if a peace agreement is not reached soon. 
"I can't betray my people.
At this point, Arafat's body language took a
pronounced shift. It was obvious that Amanpour's determined efforts were annoying him. He shifted from his usual relaxed demeanor, and began leaning forward in his chair and began insistently
pointing a finger at Amanpour. 
Another reporter would
have read the obvious shift in body language and moved on to a less intrusive question in order to relax the interviewee. However, by this time in the interview Amanpour was likewise becoming more
intense if not personal. That was when she framed her next question with a simple statement that obviously inflamed Arafat. "Your people want an economic future." 
The impact of this simple statement was obvious,
Amanpour was essentially implying is that economics is the main objective for the majority of Palestinians. With that statement the tension between them rose another notch and Arafat said:
"We Palestinians our first targets is our land (the land of the holy places)." 
